<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DevTopics &#187; C#</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.devtopics.com/category/c/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.devtopics.com</link>
	<description>Software Development Topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 20:16:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Considered C# as the Native Language for Android</title>
		<link>http://www.devtopics.com/google-considered-c-as-the-native-language-for-android/</link>
		<comments>http://www.devtopics.com/google-considered-c-as-the-native-language-for-android/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 16:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Timm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C#]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devtopics.com/google-considered-c-as-the-native-language-for-android/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, I nearly fell out of my chair when I read this little gem on TechCrunch: Android chief Andy Rubin wrote in a 2005 email, “If Sun doesn’t want to work with us, we have two options: 1) Abandon our work and adopt MSFT CLR VM and C# language – or – 2) Do Java [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.devtopics.com/google-considered-c-as-the-native-language-for-android/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apparently C# Doesn’t Suck</title>
		<link>http://www.devtopics.com/apparently-c-doesnt-suck/</link>
		<comments>http://www.devtopics.com/apparently-c-doesnt-suck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Timm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[C#]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Languages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devtopics.com/apparently-c-doesnt-suck/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DotNetBaby says, “I&#8217;m an expert on sucking, and I can assure you that C# doesn&#8217;t suck.” YourLanguageSucks is a wiki on theory.org that lists reasons why the most popular programming languages suck.&#160; There are long lists of reasons why Java, JavaScript, C++ and PHP suck.&#160; But the list for C# is very short: Supports &#8216;goto&#8217;. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.devtopics.com/apparently-c-doesnt-suck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vanity Guids</title>
		<link>http://www.devtopics.com/vanity-guids/</link>
		<comments>http://www.devtopics.com/vanity-guids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 16:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Timm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[C#]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devtopics.com/vanity-guids/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you notice anything odd about the following list? 00000000-9b6d-4998-9dd7-6026894bdfba 11111111-9022-4400-bac2-8b66a9874443 22222222-a890-4dec-98bc-f41536b760bc 33333333-e361-4239-8d04-3f16f68ad9ce 44444444-d8c2-40ab-91bd-5a84511ed9d3 55555555-447a-4aa9-a51f-35c74a154156 66666666-193b-4ac3-bd92-860b6b49aedb 77777777-49de-4cc5-b9e6-2e5785dd47af 88888888-0d00-4672-933a-d68e240772be 99999999-7d9d-4d77-9e35-5e919db0f7d1 aaaaaaaa-76cd-4d6b-bae2-574e5b57c7ab bbbbbbbb-6f9e-4d2d-ba11-64df5c7355fa cccccccc-b897-4b15-9ab3-11b97836ce85 dddddddd-b417-48ad-8b5b-b762df75e03b eeeeeeee-cc9c-4cb8-bae0-bbd4b10307fa ffffffff-8d46-4a31-b297-2ac67dda3600 Yes, they are all legitimate Guids (Globally Unique IDs).&#160; But each is also a Vanity Guid, which is a unique ID that has some recognizable pattern embedded in the Guid’s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.devtopics.com/vanity-guids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Developer Job Posted in C#</title>
		<link>http://www.devtopics.com/developer-job-posted-in-c/</link>
		<comments>http://www.devtopics.com/developer-job-posted-in-c/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 17:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Timm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[C#]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devtopics.com/developer-job-posted-in-c/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here’s a clever way to pre-screen candidates: post the job description in C# code.&#160; That’s what a company in Port Chester, New York did for a $80K-$100K .NET Developer position posted on CraigsList.&#160; The job description starts as: using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Diagnostics; using System.Linq; using System.Text; namespace CandidateSearchApp { class Program { static [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.devtopics.com/developer-job-posted-in-c/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Visual Studio 2010 and .NET Framework 4.0 Released Today</title>
		<link>http://www.devtopics.com/visual-studio-2010-and-net-framework-4-0-released-today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.devtopics.com/visual-studio-2010-and-net-framework-4-0-released-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Timm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C#]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visual Basic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visual Studio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devtopics.com/visual-studio-2010-and-net-framework-4-0-released-today/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft is releasing Visual Studio 2010, .NET Framework 4.0, and Silverlight 4 at the Visual Studio Developer Conference in Las Vegas.&#160; VS 2010 and .NET 4 are available today, and Silverlight 4 will be available to download later this week. &#160; Visual Studio Visual Studio 2010 comes in four flavors: Pro, Premium, Ultimate and Test [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.devtopics.com/visual-studio-2010-and-net-framework-4-0-released-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SharpKit C#/JavaScript Web Toolkit</title>
		<link>http://www.devtopics.com/sharpkit-cjavascript-web-toolkit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.devtopics.com/sharpkit-cjavascript-web-toolkit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Timm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[C#]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devtopics.com/sharpkit-cjavascript-web-toolkit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I ran across a novel new tool called SharpKit that generates JavaScript code from C#.&#160; I’m not using JavaScript in my current projects, so I haven’t tested this tool yet, but anyone who has worked with JavaScript knows what a hassle it can be compared to the polished managed code environment of C# and Visual [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.devtopics.com/sharpkit-cjavascript-web-toolkit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is C# Now Better Than Java?</title>
		<link>http://www.devtopics.com/is-c-now-better-than-java/</link>
		<comments>http://www.devtopics.com/is-c-now-better-than-java/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Timm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[C#]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Languages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devtopics.com/is-c-now-better-than-java/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arguing “Which programming language is better?” is like debating “Which religion is better?”  You will never find an answer because people have different needs, they judge with different criteria, and in the end, the debaters just end up getting pissed off at each other.  That’s why you’ll frequently see developers label the programming language debate [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.devtopics.com/is-c-now-better-than-java/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogs from Microsoft C# Development Team</title>
		<link>http://www.devtopics.com/blogs-from-microsoft-c-development-team/</link>
		<comments>http://www.devtopics.com/blogs-from-microsoft-c-development-team/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Timm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C#]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devtopics.com/blogs-from-microsoft-c-development-team/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Want insight into the design and development of C#?&#160; Then check out these blogs by key members of the Microsoft C# development team: C# Compiler Team Matt Warren Matt Warren is a member of the Visual C# compiler team, recently acquired from the SQL Server team.&#160; Matt’s blog entries are a journey into the twisted [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.devtopics.com/blogs-from-microsoft-c-development-team/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interview with C# Leader Anders Hejlsberg</title>
		<link>http://www.devtopics.com/interview-with-c-leader-anders-hejlsberg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.devtopics.com/interview-with-c-leader-anders-hejlsberg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Timm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[C#]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devtopics.com/interview-with-c-leader-anders-hejlsberg/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Computerworld has published an in-depth interview with Microsoft&#8217;s leader of C# development, Anders Hejlsberg.&#160; A prominent Danish software engineer, Hejlsberg also wrote Turbo Pascal and was lead architect of the team that developed Delphi.&#160; Hejlsberg shared with Computerworld his thoughts on the development of C#, future programming trends, and his experiences putting out fires.&#160; Here [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.devtopics.com/interview-with-c-leader-anders-hejlsberg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One Million Objects</title>
		<link>http://www.devtopics.com/one-million-objects/</link>
		<comments>http://www.devtopics.com/one-million-objects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Timm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[C#]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mini-tools.com/at2/devtop/wordpress/one-million-objects/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quick: How long does it take to construct one million C# objects? 1/4 second. In the &#8220;old days,&#8221; a major knock against object-oriented programming (such as with C++) was the perceived overhead required to create and maintain objects in memory.  My how times have changed! Given a simple three-property object as shown below: class Person [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.devtopics.com/one-million-objects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

