<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Vista: 3GB or 4GB RAM?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.devtopics.com/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.devtopics.com/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/</link>
	<description>Software Development Topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:36:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revitol Stretch Mark Cream</title>
		<link>http://www.devtopics.com/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/#comment-1343</link>
		<dc:creator>Revitol Stretch Mark Cream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 20:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mini-tools.com/at2/devtop/wordpress/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/#comment-1343</guid>
		<description>I belleve the issue has been fixed with one of the more recent updates, hasn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I belleve the issue has been fixed with one of the more recent updates, hasn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: venkatesh</title>
		<link>http://www.devtopics.com/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/#comment-1342</link>
		<dc:creator>venkatesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 01:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mini-tools.com/at2/devtop/wordpress/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/#comment-1342</guid>
		<description>hey i had 4gb ram but it showin 2.75GB is their any problem..............................plx plx reply</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey i had 4gb ram but it showin 2.75GB is their any problem&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;plx plx reply</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terri</title>
		<link>http://www.devtopics.com/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/#comment-1341</link>
		<dc:creator>Terri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mini-tools.com/at2/devtop/wordpress/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/#comment-1341</guid>
		<description>try msconfig - boot - advanced options - then UNCHECK the MAximum Memory function - also the dxdiag.exe function never lies - the unchecking of the maximum memory function followed by a restart showed full 4GB - not 4GB ( 3GB used ) - this is using Vista Ultimate x64 on an Acer Aspire 6935</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>try msconfig &#8211; boot &#8211; advanced options &#8211; then UNCHECK the MAximum Memory function &#8211; also the dxdiag.exe function never lies &#8211; the unchecking of the maximum memory function followed by a restart showed full 4GB &#8211; not 4GB ( 3GB used ) &#8211; this is using Vista Ultimate x64 on an Acer Aspire 6935</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.devtopics.com/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/#comment-1340</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mini-tools.com/at2/devtop/wordpress/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/#comment-1340</guid>
		<description>reply to original post, it is possible to run vista on 512MB of RAM, 1gb is better though</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reply to original post, it is possible to run vista on 512MB of RAM, 1gb is better though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sabith</title>
		<link>http://www.devtopics.com/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/#comment-1339</link>
		<dc:creator>sabith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 10:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mini-tools.com/at2/devtop/wordpress/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/#comment-1339</guid>
		<description>i&#039;ve installed 6 GB RAM in windows server 2003 and in BIOS it shows 6 GB RAM and when i check in windows server 2003 it shows 4GB RAM only ,why</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ve installed 6 GB RAM in windows server 2003 and in BIOS it shows 6 GB RAM and when i check in windows server 2003 it shows 4GB RAM only ,why</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sage</title>
		<link>http://www.devtopics.com/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/#comment-1338</link>
		<dc:creator>Sage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 21:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mini-tools.com/at2/devtop/wordpress/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/#comment-1338</guid>
		<description>Paul, the reason you don&#039;t see this problem with less than 4gb of ram is that there is still addressable space available. If you have 3gb of ram, there is 1 gig of addressable space that can be used for MMIO addressing, without impacting the physical ram. If you have 4gb ram, that MMIO space is going to lower the actual physical ram that you can access.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, the reason you don&#8217;t see this problem with less than 4gb of ram is that there is still addressable space available. If you have 3gb of ram, there is 1 gig of addressable space that can be used for MMIO addressing, without impacting the physical ram. If you have 4gb ram, that MMIO space is going to lower the actual physical ram that you can access.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Advantages of 64-Bit Windows</title>
		<link>http://www.devtopics.com/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/#comment-1337</link>
		<dc:creator>Advantages of 64-Bit Windows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mini-tools.com/at2/devtop/wordpress/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/#comment-1337</guid>
		<description>[...] Now in August 2010, most of the incompatibilities have been solved as x64 has gone mainstream.&#160; At the local Best Buy today, perhaps 90% of the full-featured laptops run 64-bit Windows 7 Home Premium.&#160; This makes sense because most new laptops come with 4-8 GB RAM, and you must run 64-bit Windows to access more than 3GB RAM. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Now in August 2010, most of the incompatibilities have been solved as x64 has gone mainstream.&#160; At the local Best Buy today, perhaps 90% of the full-featured laptops run 64-bit Windows 7 Home Premium.&#160; This makes sense because most new laptops come with 4-8 GB RAM, and you must run 64-bit Windows to access more than 3GB RAM. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kmac</title>
		<link>http://www.devtopics.com/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/#comment-1336</link>
		<dc:creator>kmac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mini-tools.com/at2/devtop/wordpress/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/#comment-1336</guid>
		<description>1GB is what windows vista requires as minimum not 2GB.
Thank-you, Microsoft Tech</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1GB is what windows vista requires as minimum not 2GB.<br />
Thank-you, Microsoft Tech</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Doyle</title>
		<link>http://www.devtopics.com/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/#comment-1335</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Doyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mini-tools.com/at2/devtop/wordpress/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/#comment-1335</guid>
		<description>&quot;So if a PC has 4 GB RAM installed, some of that 4 GB is used for MMIO.  If a PC has only 3 GB RAM installed, the entire 3 GB will likely be available since MMIO typically uses memory above the 3 GB address.&quot;

&quot;Above the 3 GB address&quot;? This doesn&#039;t make any sense.  If a PC has only 3 GB, where &quot;above&quot; 3 GB will the MMIO get mapped?  In this example, there isn&#039;t any more memory above the 3 GB. So where does it get mapped?

Also, doesn&#039;t MMIO need to get mapped on PCs with 2 GB and 1 GB of system memory, as well?  In those cases, after the MMIO is mapped, wouldn&#039;t users have the same problem, seeing only around 1.1 GB, and .1 GB, (only 100 megabytes!) of usable memory, respectively?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So if a PC has 4 GB RAM installed, some of that 4 GB is used for MMIO.  If a PC has only 3 GB RAM installed, the entire 3 GB will likely be available since MMIO typically uses memory above the 3 GB address.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Above the 3 GB address&#8221;? This doesn&#8217;t make any sense.  If a PC has only 3 GB, where &#8220;above&#8221; 3 GB will the MMIO get mapped?  In this example, there isn&#8217;t any more memory above the 3 GB. So where does it get mapped?</p>
<p>Also, doesn&#8217;t MMIO need to get mapped on PCs with 2 GB and 1 GB of system memory, as well?  In those cases, after the MMIO is mapped, wouldn&#8217;t users have the same problem, seeing only around 1.1 GB, and .1 GB, (only 100 megabytes!) of usable memory, respectively?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dodo</title>
		<link>http://www.devtopics.com/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/#comment-1334</link>
		<dc:creator>Dodo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mini-tools.com/at2/devtop/wordpress/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/#comment-1334</guid>
		<description>@bobmonkey: Then you probably have Vista x64.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@bobmonkey: Then you probably have Vista x64.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

