<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Vista: 3GB or 4GB RAM?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.devtopics.com/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.devtopics.com/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/</link>
	<description>Software Development Topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:46:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Doyle</title>
		<link>http://www.devtopics.com/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/comment-page-1/#comment-98281</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Doyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mini-tools.com/at2/devtop/wordpress/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/#comment-98281</guid>
		<description>&quot;So if a PC has 4 GB RAM installed, some of that 4 GB is used for MMIO.  If a PC has only 3 GB RAM installed, the entire 3 GB will likely be available since MMIO typically uses memory above the 3 GB address.&quot;

&quot;Above the 3 GB address&quot;? This doesn&#039;t make any sense.  If a PC has only 3 GB, where &quot;above&quot; 3 GB will the MMIO get mapped?  In this example, there isn&#039;t any more memory above the 3 GB. So where does it get mapped?

Also, doesn&#039;t MMIO need to get mapped on PCs with 2 GB and 1 GB of system memory, as well?  In those cases, after the MMIO is mapped, wouldn&#039;t users have the same problem, seeing only around 1.1 GB, and .1 GB, (only 100 megabytes!) of usable memory, respectively?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So if a PC has 4 GB RAM installed, some of that 4 GB is used for MMIO.  If a PC has only 3 GB RAM installed, the entire 3 GB will likely be available since MMIO typically uses memory above the 3 GB address.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Above the 3 GB address&#8221;? This doesn&#8217;t make any sense.  If a PC has only 3 GB, where &#8220;above&#8221; 3 GB will the MMIO get mapped?  In this example, there isn&#8217;t any more memory above the 3 GB. So where does it get mapped?</p>
<p>Also, doesn&#8217;t MMIO need to get mapped on PCs with 2 GB and 1 GB of system memory, as well?  In those cases, after the MMIO is mapped, wouldn&#8217;t users have the same problem, seeing only around 1.1 GB, and .1 GB, (only 100 megabytes!) of usable memory, respectively?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dodo</title>
		<link>http://www.devtopics.com/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/comment-page-1/#comment-98257</link>
		<dc:creator>Dodo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mini-tools.com/at2/devtop/wordpress/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/#comment-98257</guid>
		<description>@bobmonkey: Then you probably have Vista x64.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@bobmonkey: Then you probably have Vista x64.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobmonkey</title>
		<link>http://www.devtopics.com/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/comment-page-1/#comment-97152</link>
		<dc:creator>bobmonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 18:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mini-tools.com/at2/devtop/wordpress/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/#comment-97152</guid>
		<description>My Vista Home Premium recognises all of the 4GB RAM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Vista Home Premium recognises all of the 4GB RAM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://www.devtopics.com/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/comment-page-1/#comment-63031</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mini-tools.com/at2/devtop/wordpress/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/#comment-63031</guid>
		<description>Never mind how much the RAM is. It is ultimately the Windows wins. I had one gb ram and Vista works slower. and my friend has three gb ram and his system is also having the same speed as mine. Its all because of Vista.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never mind how much the RAM is. It is ultimately the Windows wins. I had one gb ram and Vista works slower. and my friend has three gb ram and his system is also having the same speed as mine. Its all because of Vista.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gaurav jalan</title>
		<link>http://www.devtopics.com/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/comment-page-1/#comment-62998</link>
		<dc:creator>gaurav jalan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 07:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mini-tools.com/at2/devtop/wordpress/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/#comment-62998</guid>
		<description>man... i m using vista ultimate. and my 4 gb was showing 3 gb in system properties. but as soon as i installed service pack 1.
guess what ?? problem solved. its showing 4 GB now.
so dont complicate the simple things..
cause its so simple to solve difficult things.
but its so difficult to be simple... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>man&#8230; i m using vista ultimate. and my 4 gb was showing 3 gb in system properties. but as soon as i installed service pack 1.<br />
guess what ?? problem solved. its showing 4 GB now.<br />
so dont complicate the simple things..<br />
cause its so simple to solve difficult things.<br />
but its so difficult to be simple&#8230; :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RS</title>
		<link>http://www.devtopics.com/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/comment-page-1/#comment-57273</link>
		<dc:creator>RS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 06:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mini-tools.com/at2/devtop/wordpress/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/#comment-57273</guid>
		<description>For more detail, see: 
http://www.dansdata.com/askdan00015.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For more detail, see:<br />
<a href="http://www.dansdata.com/askdan00015.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.dansdata.com/askdan00015.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://www.devtopics.com/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/comment-page-1/#comment-41224</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 06:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mini-tools.com/at2/devtop/wordpress/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/#comment-41224</guid>
		<description>Hi there,

I am shocked with this article. 

Facts:
a) I can not choose the operating system that is sold with the PC
b) Windows XP will be out of the market soon
c) PCs are sold with windows vista that not reach 1 GB
d) Windows vista business requires minimum 1 GB RAM

Questions: 
Why it´s not the responsibility of firms to sell computers that have memory RAM up the needs of its software?
Why it´s up to the consumer to ensure that the PC that she is buying has sufficient RAM to run the windows vista? Shouldn´t this be responsibility of the retailer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>I am shocked with this article. </p>
<p>Facts:<br />
a) I can not choose the operating system that is sold with the PC<br />
b) Windows XP will be out of the market soon<br />
c) PCs are sold with windows vista that not reach 1 GB<br />
d) Windows vista business requires minimum 1 GB RAM</p>
<p>Questions:<br />
Why it´s not the responsibility of firms to sell computers that have memory RAM up the needs of its software?<br />
Why it´s up to the consumer to ensure that the PC that she is buying has sufficient RAM to run the windows vista? Shouldn´t this be responsibility of the retailer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.devtopics.com/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/comment-page-1/#comment-40950</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 10:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mini-tools.com/at2/devtop/wordpress/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/#comment-40950</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I have a notebook with 4 GB ram, however I can see only 3GB.
I heard that I need to install some kind of an update in order to use al my ram. Im using vista home premium.
Does anyone know anything about this kind of updates?
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I have a notebook with 4 GB ram, however I can see only 3GB.<br />
I heard that I need to install some kind of an update in order to use al my ram. Im using vista home premium.<br />
Does anyone know anything about this kind of updates?<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ant</title>
		<link>http://www.devtopics.com/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/comment-page-1/#comment-38423</link>
		<dc:creator>Ant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mini-tools.com/at2/devtop/wordpress/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/#comment-38423</guid>
		<description>Actually, here&#039;s then end-all:

When running Vista(x32) with SP1, the problem of DISPLAYING the sub 4GB is rectified. OBVIOUSLY it won&#039;t show how much is AVAILABLE; neither does x64.  The reason for that is because that number is always changing (don&#039;t believe me? get a digital-style readout sidebar gadget that measures the CPU and RAM usage... That sucker jumps around worse than a hyperactive 10yr old at a Mountain Dew taste-testing convention ;) ).

I&#039;ve got a Dual-Core Lamptop (Compaq 6820s) with 4GB (and another GB, via &#039;ReadyBoost&#039;), and it runs great... AND it displays that I have 4GB.... I have a portion of that RAM allocated to my ATI card, for gaming.

Look up the &#039;PAE&#039; command for DOS. There&#039;s an option to help streamline your information, via startup and RAM.

As well, there are a few apps that run, a la quickstart and TSR, that most people don&#039;t realise are running. Go into and tweak your system startup to free up some additional (read: WASTED) memory.

And for people who&#039;re wondering:  Prefetch = ReadyBooost (Vista&#039;s ability to use USB- and Flash-based memory as a form of RAM.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, here&#8217;s then end-all:</p>
<p>When running Vista(x32) with SP1, the problem of DISPLAYING the sub 4GB is rectified. OBVIOUSLY it won&#8217;t show how much is AVAILABLE; neither does x64.  The reason for that is because that number is always changing (don&#8217;t believe me? get a digital-style readout sidebar gadget that measures the CPU and RAM usage&#8230; That sucker jumps around worse than a hyperactive 10yr old at a Mountain Dew taste-testing convention ;) ).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got a Dual-Core Lamptop (Compaq 6820s) with 4GB (and another GB, via &#8216;ReadyBoost&#8217;), and it runs great&#8230; AND it displays that I have 4GB&#8230;. I have a portion of that RAM allocated to my ATI card, for gaming.</p>
<p>Look up the &#8216;PAE&#8217; command for DOS. There&#8217;s an option to help streamline your information, via startup and RAM.</p>
<p>As well, there are a few apps that run, a la quickstart and TSR, that most people don&#8217;t realise are running. Go into and tweak your system startup to free up some additional (read: WASTED) memory.</p>
<p>And for people who&#8217;re wondering:  Prefetch = ReadyBooost (Vista&#8217;s ability to use USB- and Flash-based memory as a form of RAM.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prefetch</title>
		<link>http://www.devtopics.com/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/comment-page-1/#comment-36979</link>
		<dc:creator>prefetch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mini-tools.com/at2/devtop/wordpress/windows-vista-3gb-or-4gb-ram/#comment-36979</guid>
		<description>Vista &amp; prefetch - read about it !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vista &amp; prefetch &#8211; read about it !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
